print page
< Back
Menu > About EDB >
Forms & Circulars
-
Forms
-
Circulars
< Back
Menu > About EDB >
Annual Open Data Plans
-
Annual Open Data Plans
-
Public Sector Information
< Back
Menu > Curriculum Development >
Major Levels of Education
-
Kindergarten Education
-
Primary Education
-
Secondary Education
< Back
Menu > Curriculum Development >
Assessment
-
Basic Competency Assessment (BCA)
-
References
< Back
Menu > Students and Parents Related >
Life Planning Education and Career Guidance
-
Life Planning Education
-
Business-School Partnership Programme
< Back
Menu > Students and Parents Related >
Safety Matters
-
Safety of Students
-
School Bus Services
< Back
Menu > Students and Parents Related >
Non-Chinese speaking (NCS) students
-
Education services for non-Chinese speaking (NCS) students
-
What's new
-
Overview
< Back
Menu > Students and Parents Related >
Programs and Services
-
Programs
-
Services
< Back
Menu > Teachers Related >
Qualifications, Training and Development
-
Qualification
-
Training
-
Development
< Back
Menu > School Administration and Management >
Financial Management
-
About Financial Management
-
Information on Subsidy
-
Notes to School Finance
< Back
Menu > School Administration and Management >
School Premises Related Information
-
Allocation of a School
-
Furniture and Equipment List for New Schools
-
School Premises Maintenance
< Back
Menu > Public and Administration Related >
Public Forms and Documents
-
Public Forms
-
Efficiency Office - Guide to Corporate Governance for Subvented Organisations
< Back
Menu > Public and Administration Related >
Tender Notices
-
Tender Notices
-
Works Tender Notice
Main content start

Enrichment Programme for Secondary 2 and Secondary 3 Students in Chinese-medium Schools (2003) (For Secondary 2 and Secondary 3 levels)

 

The Enrichment Programme for Secondary 2 and Secondary 3 Students in Chinese-medium schools in Hong Kong, which consists of a series of teaching modules on cross-curricular topic, is developed to increase students’ exposure to English while they continue to learn in the mother tongue. Development of the Programme was commissioned to the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology by the Education and Manpower Bureau of the HKSAR.
The Programme should be used for classroom teaching purposes only and teachers in Hong Kong may make adaptations to and/or reproduce the materials to suit the curriculum needs of individual schools. For more effective use of the materials, teachers are advised to read through the Overview of the Programme.

 

SCOPES AND OBJECTIVES

 

Knowledge and Skills Emphasised

a) Three major learning targets:

b) Five fundamental intertwining ways of learning and using knowledge:

c) Basic receptive and productive language skills:


Details about the Materials

a)  Each module consists of materials including:

b)The majority of tasks are real and interesting to students.

c)Students are required to use a combination of language skills to complete each task.

d)Opportunities are provided for students to use and learn English in a meaningful, purposeful and authentic way.

e) The programme is learner-centred; all the modules are designed specifically to cater for the needs and experience of students.

  • On average, about 5% of the teaching time (roughly three periods per cycle) at Secondary 2 and 7% (roughly four periods per cycle) should be set aside for teaching these modules.

IMPLEMENTATION DETAILS

THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE ENRICHMENT PROGRAMME COMMITTEE

It is the responsibility of every teacher in the school to make sure that the enrichment programme is effectively implemented by contributing their own part to it. However, it is strongly recommended that a committee (The Enrichment Programme Committee) with a co-ordinator be appointed to facilitate and co-ordinate the policy.


Suggestions:

    • The committee should be a genuine language across the curriculum team, with a representative from each subject department.
    • A senior member of staff should be appointed as the team co-ordinator who would be responsible for the effective functioning of the committee and the implementation of the Enrichment Programme.
    • A co-ordinator with clearly stated job specifications and the necessary workload reduction is essential
    • The subject department representatives should also be teachers who are able to motivate and support members of their own departments in implementing changes. Within the Enrichment Programme Committee, co-ordinators for each year level or for specific purposes, might also be established.
    • The Enrichment Programme Committee should collect feedback from teachers involved to provide support and to clarify their understanding about the programme whenever necessary. Teachers may be worried that they cannot complete their original syllabuses because of the implementation of the Enrichment Programme. These worries should be groundless and teachers may need to be reassured of this. It is important to have thorough discussion and consultation to make sure that all teachers involved have a clear understanding about the rationale and objectives of the Enrichment Programme before implementing the programme.

POSSIBLE QUESTIONS RAISED BY TEACHERS

1) Who should be involved in the programme?

  ; Only teachers of English O
  ; Only subject teachers O
  ; Both teachers of English and subject teachers P

2) What are teachers' roles?

  ; Teacher of English or subject teacher? O
  ; Facilitator? P

3) What should you do if your students cannot keep up?

  ; Ignore them? O
  ; Find out the reasons? P
  ; Arrange additional lessons? O
  ; Adapt materials? P
  ; Adapt teaching schedule? P

4) What could be done to motivate your students?

  ; Emphasise the importance of improving English? O
  ; Emphasise the bad consequence of failing the programme? O
  ; Let students have sense of achievement?
- praise
- reasonable level of difficulty
P
P
  ; Select suitable materials? P
  ; Establish a warm learning atmosphere? P
  ; Build up a close relationship with your students? P

 

EFFECTIVE USE OF MATERIALS

 

1) Before the lesson (For lesson preparation, subject teachers should work together with teachers of English so that they can make use of each other's subject knowledge and skills for effective use of the materials.)

 

2) During the lesson

 

3) After the lesson

 

EFFECTIVENESS OF TEACHER TALK

 

Possible Problems Caused by Teacher Talk

  

1) fast delivery
2) complex grammatical structures
3) difficult vocabulary
4) stages of the lesson unclear

 

Strategies for Adjusting Teacher Talk

1) clear and slow articulation
2) simple language and sentence structure
3) simple vocabulary and paraphrasing
4) topic-fronting or mentioning the topic

 

Strategies for Improving Effectiveness of Teachers? Questions

 

1) Avoiding ambiguity so that your students understand your questions
2) Allowing longer wait-time so that your students have enough time to think about the answers
3) Involving more able students in helping teachers modify questions by asking them to translate the questions into Chinese whenever necessary

 

Other Strategies for Improving Communication

 
STRATEGIES
EXPLANATIONS
EXAMPLES
1)
Repetition
Repeating what one has just said
Teacher: What should students do if they want to improve their English?

Teacher: What should students do if they want to improve their English?
2)
Substitution
Revising what one has just said using simpler language
Teacher: Have you submitted your homework?

Teacher: Have you handed in/ given me your homework?
3)
Explanation
Explaining what one has just said
Teacher: To share is to give everyone something.

Teacher: Everyone has something when we share.
4)
Contrast
Giving examples which contrast with what one has just said
Teacher: Do you all know what gluesticks are?

Teacher: You can buy them in the shop that sell paper, scissors, pens, rulers, etc.
5)
Exemplification
Giving examples to explain what one has just said
Teacher: Read your letter and answer the questions. Then ask your partner the questions.

Teacher: For example, A asks B “Where does your letter come from?" B answers “India"and A writes “India".
6)
Clue-giving
Providing a clue to what one has just said
Teacher: French Fries?

Teacher: You eat them with hamburgers. They're made from potatoes.



(British Council. (1994) The Secondary English Language Immersion Bridge Programme. Hong Kong: British Council., p.33)

STANDARDISATION OF ASSESSMENT

At the end of each module, there is an assessment task which is normally either a writing or a speaking task. Even though general marking schemes have been given, it is advisable for the teachers concerned to work together to elaborate on the existing marking schemes to make them task-specific. For example, instead of giving a general criterion (Is the vocabulary appropriate and varied?), the teachers could work out one which is more task-specific (Is the vocabulary related to the topic?). As more than one teacher may be involved in teaching the programme, to standardise assessment, teachers involved may consider the questions below.

Questions to be considered:

 

  1. Do you and your colleagues agree on the allocation and weighting of marks to specific points such as content, language, appearance and presentation?
     
  2. Do you and your colleagues agree on writing conventions, i.e. do you penalize students for spelling errors?
     
  3. Is there a word limit, and do you expect students to have observed it, or are all your markers going to ignore it in marking?
     
  4. Are there half marks, and if so, have you agreed on what basis they will be awarded?
     
  5. Is there a time limit, and if so, are you going to penalize students who do not finish the task in the time allocated?

(Falvey, Holbrrok and Coniam. 1994.Assessing Students. Hong Kong: Longman. p.175)

 

 

 

 

This Programme comprises a total of 60 modules, 30 at S2 level and 30 at S3 level. Each module consists of the following:

Glossary

Since the programme (tryout version) is not designed for students' self-access learning, only the Students' Copy

and Glossary have been uploaded on this webpage. Schools which wish to obtain the Teachers' Copy and audio/audio-visual materials should send in their request to the following:

Review and Planning Section
Education Commission and Planning Division
Education Bureau
Room 1138, 11/F, Wu Chung House
213, Queen’s Road East
Wanchai, Hong Kong
or
E-mail address: eorp1@edb.gov.hk

Comments and suggestions on the Programme can also be directed to the aboveaddresses.